These filmmakers INFLUENCED me…

Someone had asked me in a comment to chat about my favorite directors. I’ve never spoken on this in the past because I’m kinda weird when it comes to doing the whole “your favorite filmmaker” thing.

This is a tough question because I don’t really have a favorite director. I appreciate so many different directors for different reasons.  It’s really tough to narrow it all down to one person.

Also, I go through phases where I study different directors for different reasons.
It makes more sense to talk about what directors I studied by phase.

Starting with when I first started filmmaking.

As a NEWBIE

When I started learning about film. I loved the usual  George Lucas – for the star wars franchise. Spielberg for obvious reasons, dudes body of work is legendary, David Lynch, for his bizarre visions. Stanley Kubrick, the godfather of film.

I admire their work but I don’t identify with these guys.
By identify, I mean  I couldn’t see myself or my values as a filmmaker reflected in them.

I loved their movies but I could never see myself making them. As a newbie, I identified with filmmakers like:

Mike Nichols

Mike was known for being an actor’s director. He could pull really great performances out on any actor regardless of their experience level. he’s the guy who did the graduate, classic. He had a background in theater and improv. I’ve always been interested in getting great performances. he was someone I could learn from Closer was my jam. Love that movie.

Ingmar Bergman

Ingmar Bergman manages to capture so much texture and emotion in his movies. All of his films feel very personal and distinct.
Cries and Whispers is my fav. It’s very dark, very powerful and personal.

The Seventh Seal is studied in film schools everywhere.

He was famous for his use of close-ups,  depicting the struggle with morality, loneliness, and existential questions. Some of his films are almost like philosophical debates.

He had this super long uninterrupted closeup in Winter Light. I don’t remember how long it was exactly but it felt like a good 10 minutes and it still worked.  He made some bold choices.

Spike Lee

I got into spike for obvious reasons. Not too many us doing it on that level at the time. For me, he represented what’s possible being a fellow African American.

There are more now but when I started, eh not so much.

Malcolm X, Inside Man, Bamboozled, were all my jams. So many classics, too many to name.

Color and race relations aside Spike has a very distinct voice. Hate it or love it, you know when you’re watching a Spike Lee film. I love that about his work.

Chan-wook Park

I love me some Chan-wook Park. For those who aren’t familiar he’s a Korean director. His earlier movies we’re just bat shit crazy.

He’s one of those directors whose work I admire, but I would never make the type of films he makes.

I really love the way he moves his camera, the angels, the shots, the production design. The attention to detail.

Lady Vengeance, Oldboy, Thirst.  All very wild yet beautiful films.

MAKING A FEATURE PHASE

I need to preface this. Making a feature film is incredibly stressful and terrifying.

If you haven’t seen the documentary I made on how I shot UNSOUND my first movie: Making UNSOUND, you should check it out.

You’re about to spend loads of money you don’t have, in most cases and time. I found it more beneficial to study directors who pulled off other low budget features.

Jurassic Park is cool and all but studying movies like that aren’t going to help me make a no-budget feature film.

Vin Diesel

I studied Strays, Vin Diesel’s first feature film. I talked about STRAYS before on this channel. Vin Diesel wrote, produced, and directed and starred in his first feature film and shot it for 40 grand.

I probably watched that film 10 times. I broke down the shots: just the texture, the blocking.

Again these are all things that I could do for my budget. That film was a huge inspiration.

Last I checked, both the film and the behind the scenes featurette are on youtube.

Shane Carruth

I studied Primer Shane Carruth’s first feature. This was made for $7,000 grand. A sci-fi film for $7,000. That’s practically pennies people. It’s unique, it’s textured, well-directed. It did well at the festivals, launched his career. The behind the scenes featurette is loaded with goodies.

Bellflower

Evan Glodell’s Bellflower was also a huge inspiration. Very edgy, very stylistic film. They even built their own camera specifically for the film. You wouldn’t believe that film only cost like 15k. amazing accomplishment

I saw this film 6 months before I started shooting UNSOUND. I got to meet the cast and crew in person. Again. another film that’s showing me what’s possible on a small budget. (green room)

p.s. I don’t advise anyone to go out and rack up $30 grand worth of dept to shoot a film. it’s incredibly irresponsible, but also if you wanna make it happen, sometimes you gotta do what you gotta do.

Robert Rodriguez

El Mariachi was a big one. Also made for 7 grand. Watched that a few times. Read the book Rebel Without a Crew*

*Affiliate link

POST FEATURE PHASE

After shooting UNSOUND. I looked at filmmaking through a whole different lens. I learned so much about myself as a filmmaker, storytelling. There are a lot of things I’m happy with but it’s not perfect. One of my biggest regrets is the lack of atmosphere.

I was so focused on telling a great story and I think we did that well but I never felt like we reached that visceral level of filmmaking. when a film has that almost hypnotic quality.

Part of it was I could only do so much with my budget, but that’s also something I need to work on. I found myself studying more lyrical directors like:

Nicolas Winding Refn

Drive is a prime example of a film that has a visceral quality, part of it’s the music, part of it’s the pacing. a number of things give it that quality.

Kar-Wai Wong

I studied Kar-Wai Wong‘s films. He’s another lyrical director. His films aren’t so much about what happens, but how it makes you feel. most of his films are meditations of love, but again, he has a visceral quality to his work.

Kar-Wai Wong has a unique fluid production process, He basically has a bare-bones idea of the story, shoots and allows his actors to improvise on the day. He shoots his films almost like a documentary and when he feels he’s shot enough then he cuts the film.

Barry Jenkins

Love me some Barry JenkinsMoonlight has that hypnotic visceral quality in my opinion. I was just blown away by that film. I knew about Barry before Moonlight, back when he did Medicine for Melancholy.

And funny enough. After making a low budget feature I’ve become an even bigger fan of the Mumblecore genre.

In a nutshell, the Mumblecore movement was basically a bunch of filmmakers in the early 2000’s made these crazy no budget dialogue-heavy movies at around the same time and it became a thing. Most of these movies, use a lot of improv, some are scripted, and there’s usually not much of a plot. Some directors associated with this genre are:

  • Mark and Jay Duplass
  • Aaron Kats
  • Andrew Bujalski
  • Lynn Shelton
  • Gretta Gerwig
  • Joe Swanberg
  • Barry Jenkins

The two biggest things that draw me to the genre are.:

  1. Great performances from actors with little to no experience
  2. Producing films for little to no money. I really like working with actors and I love making films but I hate how expensive the process can be.

After going $30 grand in personal debt and spending 7 years on one movie. I got burned out on the classical filmmaking model. The get a crew and find money thing. It’s a huge undertaking because you wind up having to wear like 20 hats. I need a break from that.

I just love shooting. I’m happiest when I’m on set. I hate fundraising. I hate asking people for money. There has to be another way to make movies.

These mumblecore guys and gals were making movies the wanted to make for next to nothing. Granted there are limitations to what you can do with next to no money, but you get to just focus on making films without the money part.

When you lower the budgets, you lower the risk, you get to keep making films,  improve your skills, and eventually work your way up to a point where people want to invest in you.

Almost all of these filmmakers who started off making movies for 100 dollars, 1,000 dollars 5,000 dollars, they’re all doing big things in Hollywood or Netflix now. I’ve studied a ton of mumblecore movies. some notables you should see if you’re interested:

Just look up Mumblecore. There’s a ton of them.

NOW

Who’s work am I currently into?

  • Jordan Peel
  • Denis Villeneuve
  • Ava DuVernay
  • Ryan Coogler

Like I said. really tough to name a favorite. There’s so much you can learn from everyone else’s process. I feel like if you limit yourself to studying one or two people you’re doing yourself a real big disservice. There are loads of peeps I haven’t mentioned too many to stuff into one post.

There are a lot of problems facing new filmmakers, I talk about the biggest one that single-handedly causes most filmmakers to throw in the towel. If you haven’t seen that video I think you should check it out. Here’s a link right there.

As usual, thank you for reading, keep hustling and DBritt out!!!!

3 Things I Wish I Knew Before I Started Making Movies

Yo, yo Darious Britt here.

I’ve been doing this film thing for 10 years now. Wow. It sounds crazy when I say it out loud—time flies. Hopped onto my first film set back in 2009 literally didn’t know anything.  I was just a PA on a student film.

Fast forward 10 years later:

And here we are.

Thinking back on everything. There are a few things I wish I had known from go. I could have saved my self a lotta time and grief.

Here are 3 things I wish I knew before I started making movies:

1. Mindset Is Everything!

Your mindset is everything. How you view your abilities. How you view your potential influences your behavior and ultimately your success. I had the wrong mindset starting out. Lemme show you the math on that:

I planned on my first feature film being a major critical and financial success. I imagined having that Cinderella story just like everyone else. Get into Sundance, make a big sale. Be the next big voice in Hollywood. I wanted to prove that I had what it takes to be a success. That didn’t quite happen for me.

It doesn’t happen that way for 99% of filmmakers. Alfred Hitchcock didn’t have massive success until much later in his career. He’d already made like ten movies before he hit his stride. It’s not fair to put that kind of pressure on your first movie, especially since you still have so much to learn.

I was approaching this all wrong. I had a fixed mindset. The fixed mindset says that: your intelligence, creativity, skills, and abilities are all predetermined. You’re either born with raw talent or your not. Your qualities are carved in stone. You can’t change it. If you’re successful, it proves that you have talent, if you’re not successful, it proves you don’t. It’s an all or nothing way of looking at it. Will I succeed or fail, win, or lose. It’s very binary.

I was stuck in the fixed mindset for years, trying to make everything perfect, trying to prove how good I am. But then I realized something.

All of the filmmakers I looked up to had a passion for learning the craft of filmmaking. These guys weren’t good because they were naturally gifted. They were good because they put their 10,000 hours in. They were successful because they loved learning, Not because they were trying to be successful. They had a growth mindset.

The growth mindset says, whatever qualities and talents you have they’re just the starting point in your development. You can cultivate new skills and abilities through practice and experience. Anyone can be anything through training and education. It’s about improving and unlocking your true potential over time.

Having a fixed mindset creates a hunger for approval; having a growth mindset creates a hunger for learning.

Ahhhhhh. I get it. If I want to be successful, I can’t chase success; I have to chase self-improvement. Then success will find me. I have to be hungry for learning. Hungry for new skills. Hungry for knowledge. I have to put in the 10,000 hours. That’s the ticket to the chocolate factory.

I switched to a growth mindset. I stopped doing projects to prove myself and started doing more projects to improve myself.

My goal became to learn as much as I can as fast as I can and enjoy the process of learning. I shot more microfilms bc you can rack up more experience a lot faster shooting really small projects.

When I made that switch, I learned more in one year than I had in the past three. And I had a lot more fun.

Had I known this a lot sooner, I could have shot so much more.

2. The Real Goal

If you’re a writer-director, the goal is to come up with a cool premise that attracts a lot of money and attention, Pitch investors or industry contacts if you have then. Get money, make the move, blow up. This is the classical way of thinking when it comes to film. 2 problems with that.

1. This places the emphasis on having a great idea, a super clever twist, a crazy premise, etc. It perpetuates this idea that you are one clever idea away from success. This couldn’t be further from the truth.

Ideas are a dime a dozen everybody has ideas. You can wake up tomorrow with a cool idea. Ideas mean nothing without a solid script. Ideas mean nothing without a writer who can turn it into a great screenplay. Ideas mean nothing without a director who can tell the story in a compelling way.

Ideas mean nothing without execution.

There’s this invisible thing between your good idea and a good movie, and that thing is craftsmanship. I say invisible because if done well, people don’t even know it’s there. All you see is the finished product. You have no clue how much expertise went into it.

Tarantino, Fincher, Hitchcock, Spielberg, Denis Villeneuve. They don’t just have good ideas. They have skills. They have craftsmanship.

If you are starting out, your goal should be to hone your craft.  All the cool ideas can wait. You don’t have to have a catchy high concept premise to make a good film.

With craft, you can take a simple story and tell it in an exceptional way. Your execution is what will set you apart from everything that has come before you. Then when you get the occasional cool idea you can knock it out of the park.

Here’s the good news  You can build your craft on small, cheap, inexpensive projects. You can build your craft shooting micro films. It’s just about collecting those 10,000 hours. Put in the work. Study other films.

2. The second problem with that line of thinking. It’s kinda hard to convince financiers to give you money with no track record. They wanna see that you know what you’re doing first. Again, making movies is about more than just having cool ideas. There’s a craft behind it.

You’ll probably have to self finance your first few projects. You’re looking at small budgets here. If you know your craft, you can shoot it so well that nobody would know your budget was handshakes and hotdogs.

If you learn how to make ¢10 look like a dollar. You’ll never go out of business.

You don’t build a film career by just having “cool ideas.” You build a career by knowing your craft. The cool ideas and big budgets are just the cherry on the top. If you can really wrap your head around this concept, then you will focus on the right things, and you will have more success.

Don’t chase money. Chase craftsmanship.

If you become an amazing craftsman, you can make amazing films for next to nothing. If you’re a good craftsman, money has a way of finding you.

If you haven’t gotten the message yet here’s the layman’s version:

 Finding money and or cool ideas are not your ticket to the chocolate factory, honing your skills are.

Embrace your limitations. If you don’t have money embrace it. At the end of the day, those things aren’t what’s important. It’s your skill, your craft, your execution.

Cool ideas and money those things come and go. You have no control over that, but hard skills don’t. Every skill you earn stays with you.

Everyone has cool ideas. You can wake up tomorrow and have a cool idea. Your mom could wake up tomorrow and have a cool idea. That doesn’t mean anything. Not everyone can wake up with a new skill. Not everyone can wake up with 10,000 hours of experience. Do you want to base your success off of something that can happen to anyone, or do you want to go out and cultivate something for yourself that not many have?

It’s okay to be passionate. It’s okay to want to do big ambitious projects. just make sure you always put learning your craft first.

You have to temper your passion with practically.

3. Embrace Failure

One thing is for certain. You will fail. You will fail a lot. You will make lots of mistakes.

You can’t avoid failure by just watching more tutorials and whatnot. Doesn’t work that way, Bruh-bruh. It’s not gonna happen.

The trick is to make inexpensive failures. Inexpensive in terms of time and money. You wanna burn through all your big mistakes on small cheap projects, like micro films. This way you have a safe little sandbox to play and fall on your face while nobody is watching.

For example, you just got a new camera, shoot some b-roll with it. Shoot a small scene with a couple of friends. Shoot a vlog, fumble through the settings. Do camera tests. Odds are you’re gonna run into a few problems. That’s the point. Now is the time to figure all this stuff out. Not on set.

The more mistakes you make the better. It means you’re doing something. If you’re not failing you’re not trying.

There’s nothing you can do at this level that’s going to hurt you. You can’t ruin your career.

What can you practice by yourself to expedite your learning? Could you be shooting 1000 photos at the park working on your composition? There’s always something you could be doing to improve yourself? Ways to burn through mistakes on your own time.

Fail fast, fail often. fail forward.

Thank you for reading. Keep those cameras rolling and rack up your 10K and learn something new every day.

-DBritt out